William Creighton’s Critique of Pauly’s Schemes, December 1818

This letter, dated December 7, 1818, from William Creighton of Boulton and Watt to James Brown in London, provides a candid critique of Jean Samuel Pauly’s innovative proposals, including a boat propulsion system and an airship, referred to as the "great air fish." Creighton expresses a harsh skepticism about the practicality and value of these inventions, reflecting the critical stance often taken by industrial engineers towards unproven technologies of the time.

Key Points:

Pauly’s Boat Propulsion Scheme: Creighton discusses Pauly’s proposal for a new method of boat propulsion, involving a unique application of power to paddle wheels. He is highly critical, describing the scheme as "not worth a farthing" and expressing doubt about its practical value. Creighton emphasizes that rigorous testing would likely reveal the proposal's inadequacies.

Reference to “Great Air Fish” (Airship): The letter mentions Pauly’s ambitious airship project, termed the "great air fish." Creighton notes ...

 


To access the Jean Samuel Pauly Archives, please log in or become a member of the Lefaucheux Museum. Members enjoy exclusive access to detailed historical archives, rare documents, and in-depth insights into the pioneering innovations of Jean Samuel Pauly and his influence on Casimir Lefaucheux. Join our community to explore these invaluable resources and support the preservation of firearm history.